§ 07 · CORRESPONDENCE
contact
Editorial correspondence on the GHK-Cu literature. Corrections, citation suggestions, journalist inquiries.
what we respond to
We reply to editorial correspondence about the GHK-Cu research literature. The most useful messages name a specific claim on a specific page, link a primary source we should have included or read differently, and explain what the source actually shows. We are particularly interested in newer (post-2024) peer-reviewed work we may have missed.
Correction requests are taken seriously. If you see a quantitative claim on this site that misrepresents a primary source, please tell us which page, which figure, and which citation, and we will check the source and update the page if the source supports the correction.
what we cannot respond to
We cannot answer questions that ask for medical advice. Questions of the form "is GHK-Cu safe for me" or "what dose should I take" or "how should I cycle this" fall outside the scope of an editorial project, and we have no way to give a responsible answer. The right resource for those questions is a licensed clinician with access to your full medical history.
We do not respond to vendor solicitations, affiliate-marketing pitches, or requests to add commercial links to the site. We do not host sponsored content. Our work is editorial commentary on publicly available research, and the references page is the only outbound-link surface.
send a message
The form below collects a short message and an optional reply address. We read every submission, but we cannot guarantee a reply within any specific timeframe — most editorial correspondence is read within a week.
This site is an independent editorial project. It does not provide medical advice and has no commercial interest in GHK-Cu or any related product.